C 325 er impropriety of the decision at the time it was given; and thus at the point on which they had to decide lies that decision should have been given and whether it could have been given if the Court had by then possession of the 31st February special and had not been deprived by some forged document. The documents as found most go to & for forgery that was vital to the plot. By posing the Court 2014 Absthur & A & FITE.er could ably done year or two previously entitled them to be admitted in regard 166! He did not consider the plaintiffs are weak they might have urged the Government, but interfere, happened in this case, could not prevent them from taking action against the Government or anyone else they thought fit, and he declined to allow the question they had to lay as to whether the decision or the land Court was a proper decision, by adding Duke lots AB respondents.
2. Pollock J. thought the application ought to be refused. It appeared to him to admit Olene 2; „licants 20 22 respondents would amplify the difficulty of coming to a decision on the question of whether the Land Court was right or wrong when they allowed this claim. At the time the Land Court gave their decision the applicants, so far as this house was concerned, were non-existent. He was of the opinion that the application was made merely to try to get a title out of the Court, which he was not inclined to do.
The application was dismissed with costs.
C
325
er impropriety of the decision at the time it was given; and thus a the grind on lich they had to decide lice thor that decision grould hors been given and whether it
culd have in piwe if the Court had by n da poscepsion of 31 6 fecia nd had not bou declived by some forg à doowoont. 71 the doesnt as found mob Go 10 & forgery
that es van uiô of the PLOT. By posing the Court 2014
Abat thur & A & FITE.er could ab ras done year or ino pors ofboxvezde cntitle them to be adattled in roagend 166! He did not cion e proclars are oleks they might have ugen the Goverrunt, but intere, happered in this c.pe .cula not prevent them from buking sobien against the Government
62 angone else thep Chought fit, and he declined A Shio atkyo to complicato the question they had to bay as to Whether the Gücledon or the band Couch Jue a propor dick- alou, by acibling Du k 1c.ots AB respondents.
2. Pulore Judge thought the application ought to be
refused. It appo rid 6 A t so admit Olene 2; „licuats
20 220,ondents would aplify the difficulty of culling to a decision on the question or be whetiver the Tend Court tras right or wrong When the allowed thin club. At the time
the Band Court gave their decisiun thegu cyplicents so far
Le tlits ouse was concerned were non-exist mt. Die was of the cpinion that the a plicasion van oude ve-17% to try to gat a tille out of the Court, which he was not inelinna be do.
The epplication was dlordgued with costs.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.